WHITE CASTLE v. PLANNING BD.


244 N.J. Super. 688 (1990)

583 A.2d 406

WHITE CASTLE SYSTEMS, A FOREIGN CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF CLIFTON, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 12, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Pogorelec, attorney for appellant (John D. Pogorelec on the brief).

Goldman, Carlet, Garrison & Klein, attorneys for respondent (Frank A. Carlet on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, HAVEY and SKILLMAN.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.

Defendant Planning Board of the City of Clifton (Board) appeals from a judgment reversing its denial of plaintiff White Castle Systems' (White Castle) conditional use and site plan applications. The trial judge concluded that denial of the applications was factually unsupported, arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable.

On appeal, the Board's central point...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases