1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 739 F.Supp.
  5. 739 F.Supp. 173 (1990)
 

GUARDSMARK, INC. v. PINKERTON'S INC.

No. 90 Civ. 2442 (MGC).

739 F.Supp. 173 (1990)

GUARDSMARK, INC., Plaintiff, v. PINKERTON'S, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York,

June 6, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donovan Leisure Newton & Irvine, New York City, by Kenneth N. Hart, David S. Versfelt, Rogovin, Huge & Schiller, Washington, D.C. by William A. Isaacson, Alan Howard, Jonathon D. Schiller, for plaintiff.

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, New York City, by David Sellinger, John L. Sander, John P. Carey, Ronald P. Mysliwiec, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Guardsmark, Inc., and defendant, Pinkerton's, Inc., are in the business of providing security services. Both companies believe that psychological testing of security guards is important to the provision of effective security services, and both agree that in recent years users of security services have become increasingly interested in the psychological testing of the security officers assigned to them...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases