1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 751 F.Supp.
  5. 751 F.Supp. 155 (1990)
 

MOSKOWITZ v. VITALINK COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

No. C 90-1717 SAW.

751 F.Supp. 155 (1990)

Stephen MOSKOWITZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. VITALINK COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION and George Archuleta, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

October 30, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Finberg, Elizabeth Cabraser, Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann, San Francisco, Cal., Lowey, Dannenberg, Bemporad & Selinger, PC, New York City, for plaintiff.

Jared L. Kopel, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, Cal., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEIGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Moskowitz is the individual representative of a class action suit against defendants Vitalink Communications Corporation ("Vitalink") and George Archuleta. Plaintiff sues (1) for violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j; 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and (2) for common law negligent misrepresentation.

Defendant Vitalink is a Delaware corporation with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases