KAY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON

No. 89-1993.

902 F.2d 1 (1990)

Martha KAY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON and Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, Defendants, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided May 2, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew C. Schultz with whom Field & Schultz, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for plaintiff, appellant.

Joseph G. Blute with whom Michelle J. Lipton and Nutter, McClennen & Fish, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for defendants, appellees.

Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, COFFIN and BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of summary judgment entered by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in a prescription drug products liability action. The plaintiff, Martha Kay, claims that she suffers from hyperpigmentation, a severe pigmentary disorder, as a result of her use, during the period 1966-68, of Ortho Novum, an oral contraceptive manufactured by Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation ("Ortho"). Plaintiff asserts claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases