GENERAL LAND OFFICE v. RUTHERFORD OIL

No. 3-90-037-CV.

802 S.W.2d 65 (1990)

GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF the STATE OF TEXAS, State of Texas and Garry Mauro, Appellants, v. RUTHERFORD OIL CORPORATION, Conoco, Inc. and Ladd Petroleum Corporation, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

Rehearing Overruled February 6, 1991.

Second Rehearing Overruled March 13, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., Jose Manuel Rangel, Liz Bills, Priscilla M. Hubenak, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, for appellants.

P.M. Schenkkan, Vinson & Elkins, Tom C. McCall, Lynch, Chappell & Alsup, Austin, for appellees.

Before SHANNON, C.J., and ABOUSSIE and JONES, JJ.


SHANNON, Chief Justice.

Appellant General Land Office and others 1 seek to set aside the summary judgment of the district court of Travis County in a declaratory judgment suit. By its judgment, the district court declared that the GLO is not authorized by Tex.Nat.Resources Code §§ 52.135 and 52.137 to adjudicate contract rights of parties to a mineral lease. Appellees are Rutherford Oil Corporation and others.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases