1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 240 N.J.
  5. 240 N.J. Super. 614 (1990)
 

MACEK v. FRIEDMAN

240 N.J. Super. 614 (1990)

573 A.2d 996

CARL MACEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CYNTHIA S. FRIEDMAN, F/N/A CYNTHIA MACEK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 10, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur J. Russo argued the cause for appellant.

Francis X. Gavin argued the cause for respondent (Mulligan, Mulligan & Gavin, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, DREIER and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.

Carl R. Macek (the father) appeals from a June 28, 1989 order of the Chancery Division, Family Part, dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We now reverse and remand.

The complaint was filed in September, 1988, and sought an order restraining Cynthia S. Friedman (the mother) from removing the parties' two minor children from New Jersey. The parties had been divorced in Pennsylvania in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases