MATTER OF ALBERT


120 N.J. 698 (1990)

577 A.2d 507

IN THE MATTER OF JOEL M. ALBERT, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 8, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. McCormick, First Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Barry I. Croland argued the cause for respondent (Stern, Steiger, Croland, Tanenbaum & Schielke, attorneys; Barry I. Croland and Jay Rubenstein, on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

A local District Ethics Committee (DEC) issued a presentment in one case and a recommendation for public discipline in another, in these disciplinary proceedings against respondent, Joel M. Albert. After a de novo review, a majority of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for three months. Three members of the DRB would have imposed a public reprimand.

In the first case respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases