1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 241 N.J.
  5. 241 N.J. Super. 557 (1990)
 

BELL v. MERCHANTS & BUSINESSMEN'S MUT.

241 N.J. Super. 557 (1990)

575 A.2d 878

WILLIAM BELL AND SYLVIA BELL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MERCHANTS AND BUSINESSMEN'S MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 14, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry J. Tyler argued the cause for appellants (Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, attorneys, Henry J. Tyler and Douglas K. Walker on the brief).

Jay Barry Harris argued the cause for respondent (Fineman & Bach, attorneys, Jay Barry Harris and Adam M. Share on the brief).

Before Judges KING, BAIME and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was rendered by BAIME, J.A.D.

This appeal presents a choice-of-law question relating to the interpretation of a contractual limitations provision contained in a "special multi-peril" policy of insurance. The policy was issued by defendant Merchants and Businessmen's Mutual Insurance Company, a carrier licensed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to plaintiffs William and Sylvia Bell, residents of that state, and, among other things, covered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases