1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 238 N.J.
  5. 238 N.J. Super. 531 (1990)
 

GOTTLIEB v. NEWARK INS. CO.

238 N.J. Super. 531 (1990)

570 A.2d 443

LEONARD GOTTLIEB AND ESTHER GOTTLIEB, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEWARK INSURANCE COMPANY AND ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND APEX PEST CONTROL, INC. AND PAUL GALASSO AND CAROL GALASSO, T/A APEX PEST CONTROL, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 13, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Goldman argued the cause for appellants (Goldman & Goldman, attorneys; Vincent E. Ludwig on the brief).

Joseph G. Mosolino argued the cause for respondents Newark Insurance Company and Royal Insurance Company. (Joseph G. Mosolino, attorney; Joseph G. Mosolino of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, LONG and LANDAU.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D.

Appellants Leonard and Esther Gottlieb (Gottliebs) are homeowners who sued defendant Apex Pest Control, Inc. (Apex) in a separate action to recover for damages suffered by reason of the application of toxic chemicals, chlordane and heptachlor, to the exterior, basement tool room, and crawl space of their home in May 1982. Their home was tested on April 28, 1983 by Princeton Testing Labs and presence of those...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases