1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 738 F.Supp.
  5. 738 F.Supp. 15 (1990)
 

U.S. v. SMITHEN

Crim. No. 90-125.

738 F.Supp. 15 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America v. Bertsfield SMITHEN and John Hoffman a.k.a. John Joseph, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 25, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Hilbarger, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for U.S.

Gregory English, Alexandria, Va., for defendant Hoffman.

Thomas F. Dunn, Arlington, Va., for defendant Smithen.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant Bertsfield Smithen's motion to suppress physical evidence. Co-defendant John Hoffman filed a "motion to adopt" Smithen's motion to suppress. This motion was granted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court treats the motion before it as a joint motion of the defendants to suppress. Defendants contend that the evidence seized from them must be suppressed because it resulted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases