PEDRO v. PEDRO

No. C6-90-814.

463 N.W.2d 285 (1990)

Alfred PEDRO, Respondent, v. Carl PEDRO, Jr., Eugene Pedro and the Pedro Companies, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 24, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger A. Christianson, Russell J. Jensen, Russell J. Jensen, P.A., St. Paul, for appellants.

John Paul Martin, Margaret M. Leighton, Peterson, Tews & Squires, Steven A. Clapp, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and PARKER and KLAPHAKE, JJ.


OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Respondent Alfred Pedro commenced this action against appellants Carl Pedro, Jr., Eugene Pedro and the Pedro Companies (TPC), seeking dissolution of TPC; appointment of a receiver; damages for lost wages; infliction of emotional distress and slander; and an award of attorney fees. Appellants counterclaimed for breach of fiduciary duty, mismanagement and waste of corporate property. The trial court submitted the controversy to the jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases