1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 241 N.J.
  5. 241 N.J. Super. 503 (1990)
 

O'BOYLE v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO.

241 N.J. Super. 503 (1990)

575 A.2d 515

MARIE O'BOYLE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 6, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis Stein argued the cause for appellant (Nusbaum, Stein, Goldstein, Bronstein & Compeau, attorneys; Victor A. Amada, on the brief).

Randi S. Greenberg argued the cause for respondent (Robert A. Auerbach, attorney; Randi S. Greenberg, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, SHEBELL and BAIME.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This case concerns the right of an insured to collect "no fault" income continuation benefits (N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4) provided by her personal injury protection (PIP) coverage where she has already been fully reimbursed for her lost earnings through an income continuation plan provided by her employer, Sears. Plaintiff worked at Sears as a salesperson when she was hurt in an automobile accident on August 4...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases