1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 731 F.Supp.
  5. 731 F.Supp. 3 (1990)
 

U.S. v. BAKER HUGHES INC.

Civ. A. No. 89-3333.

731 F.Supp. 3 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, Eimco Secoma, S.A., and Oy Tampella AB, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

February 21, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony V. Nanni, J. Robert Kramer, II, Bruce K. Yamanaga, Charles R. Schwidde, Jerry D. Threet, Antitrust Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

William J. Baer, Washington, D.C., for Baker Hughes and Secoma.

David Marx, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Ronald A. Bloch, Lizbeth R. Levinson, Washington, D.C., for Tampella.

MEMORANDUM

GESELL, District Judge.

The United States, invoking Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, seeks by its complaint to enjoin a proposed acquisition on the ground that it may substantially lessen competition in hardrock hydraulic underground drilling rigs. The proposed acquisition has been postponed pending this decision on the merits, which is now before the Court after two days of hearings and the filing of proposed findings of fact...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases