1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 239 N.J.
  5. 239 N.J. Super. 362 (1990)
 

GAUTAM v. CONTE

239 N.J. Super. 362 (1990)

571 A.2d 344

URMILA GAUTAM AND NARINDER GAUTAM, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DOMINICK P. CONTE AND SAMUEL R. DE LUCA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 20, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Narinder Gautam, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Dominick P. Conte, respondent, argued the cause pro se.

Before Judges MICHELS, DEIGHAN and R.S. COHEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Urmila Gautam and Narinder Gautam appeal from a post-judgment order of the Law Division that vacated a judgment against defendant Dominick P. Conte, Esq. (Conte) in this legal malpractice action. The pivotal issue raised by this appeal is whether Conte is entitled to the benefit of the judgment entered in favor of his codefendant Samuel R. De Luca, Esq (De Luca) in Gautam v. De Luca,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases