1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 243 N.J.
  5. 243 N.J. Super. 349 (1990)
 

ANFUSO v. SEELEY

243 N.J. Super. 349 (1990)

579 A.2d 817

FRANK A. ANFUSO AND ANNE M. ANFUSO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. KEITH T. SEELEY, CAROL L. SEELEY AND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 21, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary E. Fox argued the cause for the appellants Frank A. Anfuso and Anne M. Anfuso (Fox & Mc Govern, attorneys; Mitchell J. Ansell, on the brief).

William J. O'Hagan, Jr. argued the cause for the respondents, Keith T. Seeley and Carol L. Seeley (Stout & O'Hagan, attorneys; William J. O'Hagan, Jr., and Scott R. Baron, on the brief).

Patricia A. Heffernan argued the cause for the respondent, Board of Adjustment of Oceanport (Heffernan & Wersinger, attorneys).

Before Judges KING, SHEBELL and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

The issues presented on this appeal require us to address the zoning power of a municipality as it relates to federal and State regulation of navigable water and tidal land within the municipality.

Plaintiffs Frank A. and Anne M. Anfuso appeal from a Law Division judgment that affirmed the decision of defendant Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Oceanport (Board) to grant a use variance and several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases