1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 241 N.J.
  5. 241 N.J. Super. 297 (1990)
 

GOODY PRODUCTS v. DUN & BRADSTREET

241 N.J. Super. 297 (1990)

574 A.2d 1032

GOODY PRODUCTS, INC., PLAINTIFFS, v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., ET ALS., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Union County.

Decided March 16, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark T. McMenamy (Bressler, Amery & Ross), for plaintiff.

John E. Caruso, Elizabeth A. Read, Dennis P. Lynch, and Christopher Baxter, (Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads), for defendants, Dun & Bradstreet, et al.

Patrick J. Conlon, (Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohn, Fisher & Boylan), for defendants, Joseph Polina and John Swiontkowski.

MENZA, J.S.C.

This case involves interpretation of the Racketeering Statute (RICO).

It is a matter of first impression in New Jersey.

Plaintiff has brought suit against Dun & Bradstreet (D & B), and a number of employees, alleging that they defrauded the plaintiff.

Each year, from 1980 through 1986, the plaintiff entered into two contracts with D & B whereby D & B agreed to furnish...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases