1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 320 Md.
  5. 320 Md. 178 (1990)
 

EAST PRINCE FREDERICK CORP. v. BOARD

No. 118, September Term, 1989.

320 Md. 178 (1990)

577 A.2d 27

EAST PRINCE FREDERICK CORPORATION v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 31, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl G. Feissner (Eric S. Slatkin, Feissner & Slatkin, on brief), Burtonsville, for petitioner.

Mary M. Krug (Allen S. Handen, Handen and Krug, on brief), Prince Frederick, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, COLE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, ADKINS and CHASANOW, JJ.

ADKINS, Judge.

Whether Calvert County's "use-it-or-lose-it" sewer and water allocation policy violates the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution is the issue before us.1 Perceiving no constitutional violation, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.

I.

The facts that frame the controversy are reasonably straightforward. In July, 1978 petitioner, East Prince Frederick Corporation (EPF), (actually...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases