ALLEN v. ROUSE TOYOTA JEEP, INC.

No. 8928SC1178.

398 S.E.2d 64 (1990)

100 N.C. App. 737

Shelby Ogle ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. ROUSE TOYOTA JEEP, INC., formerly d/b/a Carolina Toyota, and Carolina Toyota, Inc., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 4, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moore, Lindsay & True by Ronald C. True, Asheville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Mullinax & Alexander by William M. Alexander, Jr., Hendersonville, for defendants-appellees.


WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiff has assigned error to the trial court's conclusions that the value of the automobile was not substantially impaired and that it was not substantially impaired for its intended use. She also assigns error to the court's conclusion that there was a substantial change in the vehicle not due to any defect before the attempted revocation. We reverse and remand.

North Carolina General Statute § 25-2-608 provides in pertinent part:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases