1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 245 N.J.
  5. 245 N.J. Super. 61 (1990)
 

HALLE v. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE

245 N.J. Super. 61 (1990)

583 A.2d 1149

WILLIAM W. HALLE, IV, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND FORMER WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERT F. MOLNAR SR. AS AN INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 1, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William W. Halle, IV, argued pro se.

Timothy M. Casey argued the cause for respondent Township of Woodbridge.

Joseph J. Benedict argued the cause for respondent Robert F. Molnar, Sr. (Benedict and Altman, attorneys; Joseph J. Benedict and Doris E. McNeil, on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY and GRUCCIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GRUCCIO, J.A.D.

This case arises from an effort by plaintiff William W. Halle, IV, to remove defendant Robert F. Molnar, Sr. (Molnar, Sr.), from his position of Public Works Director of defendant Township of Woodbridge (Woodbridge). Plaintiff appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants.

On January 25, 1989, plaintiff filed a complaint in lieu of prerogative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases