1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 242 N.J.
  5. 242 N.J. Super. 1 (1990)
 

B. & W. ASSOCIATES v. PLANNING BD.

242 N.J. Super. 1 (1990)

575 A.2d 1371

B. & W. ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF HACKETTSTOWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 9, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Podlas argued the cause for appellant.

Douglas K. Wolfson argued the cause for respondent (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis and Bergstein, attorneys, Douglas K. Wolfson of counsel and with Meryl A.G. Gonchar and Judith Mendelson Richman, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, DREIER and SCALERA.

PER CURIAM.

The Planning Board of the Town of Hackettstown appeals from a judgment entered on a complaint in lieu of prerogative writ filed by B & W Associates adjudicating that certain rights had accrued to the plaintiff as a result of an earlier preliminary major subdivision approval by the Board.

B & W owns property in the Industrial Park Zone (IP) in Hackettstown where permitted uses originally included warehousing, office, manufacturing and distribution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases