1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 766 F.Supp.
  5. 766 F.Supp. 1550 (1990)
 

RICE v. COMTEK MFG. OF OREGON, INC.

Civ. No. 89-1198-JU.

766 F.Supp. 1550 (1990)

La Vonne RICE, Plaintiff, v. COMTEK MANUFACTURING OF OREGON, INC., an Oregon corporation, and Tektronix, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

November 12, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Busse, Donald B. Potter, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Charles F. Hinkle, Glenn J. Hovemann, Portland, Or., for defendants.

ORDER

REDDEN, Chief Judge:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), Judge Juba ruled on plaintiff La Vonne Rice's motion to amend. Plaintiff has requested a review of that ruling. "Pretrial orders of a magistrate under § 636(b)(1)(A) are reviewable under the `clearly erroneous and contrary to law' standard; they are not subject to de novo determination as are a magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases