1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 766 F.Supp.
  5. 766 F.Supp. 1544 (1990)
 

RICE v. COMTEK MFG. OF OREGON, INC.

Civ. No. 89-1198-JU.

766 F.Supp. 1544 (1990)

La Vonne RICE, Plaintiff, v. COMTEK MANUFACTURING OF OREGON, INC., an Oregon corporation; and Tektronix, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

November 12, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Busse, Donald B. Potter, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Charles F. Hinkle, Glenn J. Hovemann, Portland, Or., for defendants.

ORDER

REDDEN, Chief Judge:

Judge Juba filed his Findings and Recommendation on Rice v. Comtek Manufacturing of Oregon, Inc., CV 89-1198-JU. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R. Civ.P. 72(b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases