CONTI v. CITY OF FREMONT

No. 88-15781.

919 F.2d 1385 (1990)

Samuel CONTI; Picadilly Circus, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY OF FREMONT; Gus Morrison, John Pomidor, Kent McClain, William Armon and Phil Lammi, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 28, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles D. Chalmers, Skjervan, Morrill, MacPherson, Franklin & Friel, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Charles J. Williams, Williams & Robbins, Martinez, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before TANG and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and STEPHENS, District Judge.


TANG, Circuit Judge:

The City of Fremont, California refused Samuel Conti's request to amend a zoning conditional use permit which prohibited service of people eighteen to twenty years old at a Fremont business location. Because of this refusal, Samuel Conti and his company Picadilly Circus, Inc. (together referred to as "Conti") brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the City of Fremont, several City employees, and City Council and Planning Commission members...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases