1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 732 F.Supp.
  5. 732 F.Supp. 1503 (1990)
 

CHICAGO RIDGE THEATRE v. M & R AMUSEMENT CORP.

No. 82 C 3141.

732 F.Supp. 1503 (1990)

CHICAGO RIDGE THEATRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. M & R AMUSEMENT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

March 16, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheldon O. Collen, Epton, Mullin & Druth, Ltd., and Therese M. Obringer and Paul E. Slater, Sperling, Slater & Spitz, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Robert W. Bergstrom, Ronald W. Teeple and John L. Leonard, Bergstrom, Davis & Teeple, Chicago, Ill., Philip R. Toomin, Winnetka, Ill., James G. Hunter, Jr., Latham & Watkins, Hedlund, Hunter & Lynch, Chicago, Ill., and Altheimer & Gray, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION/FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.

This case comes to this court following a remand from the Court of Appeals in Chicago Ridge Theater Ltd. v. M & R Amusement, 855 F.2d 465 (7th Cir.1988). In the wake of that decision, the defendants have renewed their motions for judgment under Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.Pro.1 In opposing these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases