1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 728 F.Supp.
  5. 728 F.Supp. 1396 (1990)
 

FAMILYSTYLE OF ST. PAUL v. CITY OF ST. PAUL

No. 3-89 CIV 459.

728 F.Supp. 1396 (1990)

FAMILYSTYLE OF ST. PAUL, INC., a Minnesota corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation; St. Paul City Council; Individual City Council Members; James Scheibel; Robert Long; Kiki Sonnen; Janice Rettman; Roger Goswitz; Tom Dimond; State of Minnesota Office of the Attorney General; and Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.

January 18, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl P. Gray, and Richard J. Malacko, St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff.

Jerome J. Segal, Asst. City Atty., St. Paul, Minn., for defendant City of St. Paul.

Gail M. Olson, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., for defendant Hubert H. Humphrey III.

ORDER

ALSOP, Chief Judge.

The above entitled matter came before the court December 27, 1989 on motions for summary judgment. Familystyle of St. Paul, Inc. ("Familystyle") and the City of St. Paul have both moved for summary judgment. The Attorney General has not formally noticed a motion, but agrees that summary judgment is appropriate at this time and has requested that judgment be entered in his favor. The parties have signed a "Stipulation of Facts" for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases