HUDSPETH v. C.I.R.

No. 88-7040.

914 F.2d 1207 (1990)

Fred E. HUDSPETH, et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 13, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence H. Greenwood, Rappleyea, Beck, Helterline & Roskie, Portland, Oregon, for petitioners-appellants.

Gary R. Allen, Atty., Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Before BROWNING and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and TEVRIZIAN, District Judge.


TEVRIZIAN, District Judge:

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

This case presents questions concerning the proper interpretation of the tax benefit rule and Federal Rule of Evidence 408. We hold that the tax court properly construed the tax benefit rule. However, the tax court erroneously excluded certain evidence that should have been admitted under the bias exception to Federal Rule of Evidence 408.

FACTS

The appellants are shareholders of Hudspeth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases