1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 731 F.Supp.
  5. 731 F.Supp. 1336 (1990)
 

UNITED TRANSP. UNION v. CHICAGO & ILLINOIS MIDLAND

No. 89-3014.

731 F.Supp. 1336 (1990)

UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO & ILLINOIS MIDLAND RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division.

March 6, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clinton J. Miller, III, United Transportation Union, Cleveland, Ohio, William K. Cavanagh, Springfield, Ill., for plaintiff.

Charles E. Holt, Graham & Graham, Springfield, Ill., for defendant.

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

At issue is whether the Defendant railroad is required to engage in nationwide, multi-employer collective bargaining or whether the railroad can bargain on its own behalf at the local level. We find that the Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Company is not required to engage in nationwide handling of the wage and rules proposals that are in dispute.

This cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases