1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 764 F.Supp.
  5. 764 F.Supp. 1231 (1990)
 

HUGHES v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

No. L89-10077 CA.

764 F.Supp. 1231 (1990)

Jack R. HUGHES and Merle A. Pettit, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D.

On Motion to Reconsider May 18, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Nelson, Tolley, Fisher & Verwys, P.C., Grand Rapids, Mich., for plaintiffs.

William R. Schulz, Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C., Lansing, Mich., for defendant.

OPINION

HILLMAN, Senior District Judge.

This case concerns the "important, confusing and depressing subject of [ERISA] preemption." Springer v. Wal-Mart Associates' Group Health Plan, 714 F.Supp. 1168, 1170 (N.D.Ala.1989). In a sad commentary on what a perplexing thicket ERISA has created, it has been over ten years since plaintiffs were allegedly wronged and a court has yet to consider the merit of plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases