1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 167 Ariz.
  5. 167 Ariz. 30 (1990)
 

POTOMAC INS. CO. v. McINTOSH

No. 1 CA-CV 88-288.

167 Ariz. 30 (1990)

804 P.2d 759

POTOMAC INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company authorized to do business in Arizona, and Shand-Morahan Company, its managing underwriters, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Frank D. McINTOSH; Donald McIntosh and Webster Lehmann, Jr., Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Review Denied June 6, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vermeire & Turley, P.C. by Richard N. Crenshaw, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Farley, Robinson & Larsen by James J. Farley, Phoenix, for defendants-appellants.

OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether an attorney's professional liability insurance covers his action when dealing in a business context with his clients. The appeal arises from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellees on the basis that no insurance coverage existed for claims made by appellants against appellees' insured.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Sometime during 1982...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases