1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 744 F.Supp.
  5. 744 F.Supp. 1181 (1990)
 

RAUH v. COYNE

Civ. A. Nos. 88-0833(HHG), 89-1049(HHG).

744 F.Supp. 1181 (1990)

Margaret W. RAUH, Plaintiff, v. Marshall B. COYNE, et al., Defendants. Renate BOTTALICO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Marshall B. COYNE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 2, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David H. Shapiro, Kator, Scott & Heller, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff Rauh.

Winn Newman, Lisa Newell, Eric Hard, Eric Steele, Newman & Newell, Washington, D.C., for Bottalico plaintiffs.

Allen G. Siegel, Stephan J. Boardman, Henry Morris, Jr., Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn, Washington, D.C., for Coyne defendants.

Daniel M. Clements, Israelson, Salsbury, Clements & Bekman, Baltimore, Md., Special Counsel for defendant Marshall Coyne.

Richard Huber, Washington, D.C., for defendant Wlodawsky.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.

A number of motions are pending in these cases which the parties believe should be decided expeditiously because their disposition will control the length and timing of discovery and the timing of the trial.1

A. Defendants' Motion in Limine

Defendants have filed a motion in limine regarding the admissibility of several categories of evidence, and plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases