KARNES v. DOCTORS HOSPITAL

No. 88-2174.

51 Ohio St. 3d 139 (1990)

KARNES, APPELLANT, v. DOCTORS HOSPITAL, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 30, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lucas, Prendergast, Albright, Gibson & Newman and Rankin M. Gibson, for appellant.

Baker & Hostetler, Ronald G. Linville, Charles J. Chastang and Bettina C. Altizer, for appellee.

Spater, Gittes & Terzian, Frederick M. Gittes, John S. Marshall, Law Offices of Andrew J. Ruzicho and Louis A. Jacobs, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Employment Lawyers Association.


Per Curiam.

I

It is the contention of appellant that the trial court erred in granting appellee's motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment. In this regard, appellant maintains that there exist genuine issues of material fact regarding the nature of her employment relationship with appellee. The first two counts of appellant's complaint contain allegations which propound a contractual theory of recovery. In essence, these allegations advance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases