James SCHMIDT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WISCONSIN EMPLOYE TRUST FUNDS BOARD, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued November 28, 1989.
Decided January 4, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the defendant-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Warren M. Schmidt, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was Donald J. Hanaway, attorney general.
For the plaintiff-appellant there was a brief by Simon M. Karter and Wyngaard & Wilson, Madison and oral argument by Mr. Karter.
Amicus curiae brief was filed by Richard v. Graylow and Lawton & Cates, S.C., Madison for The American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees and The Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
STEINMETZ, J.
The issue before us is whether the court of appeals correctly interpreted and applied the language of sec. 42.245(1), Stats. 19651 to hold that the appellant, James Schmidt is entitled to three years of creditable teaching service. The three years represent one-half of the six years of prior teaching service accumulated. At issue are the rights retained under the State Teachers Retirement System Fund for the period 1957 to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.