1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 793 P.2d
  5. 793 P.2d 880 (1990)
 

STATE v. EVETT

10-88-01541; CA A61332.

793 P.2d 880 (1990)

102 Or.App. 37

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Richard Eugene EVETT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 30, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay W. Frank, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Moule & Frank, Eugene.

Janet A. Klapstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions for kidnapping in the first degree, ORS 163.235, burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160. He argues that the trial court erred in placing him on probation for the kidnapping and burglary convictions, because it already had imposed a sentence on him for those offenses.

Following a sentencing hearing, the court issued a written "Order of Probation" that provided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases