1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 787 P.2d
  5. 787 P.2d 884 (1990)
 

GARCIA v. BOISE CASCADE CORP.

WCB No. 85-15946; CA A46569; SC S35840.

787 P.2d 884 (1990)

309 Or. 292

In the matter of the Compensation of Reyes S. GARCIA, Claimant. Reyes S. Garcia, Respondent On Review, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan A. Bischoff, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. On the petition for review were Robert R. Trethewy, and Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson & DeMuniz, P.C., Salem.

Quintin B. Estell, Salem, filed the response and argued the cause for respondent on review.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and LINDE, CARSON, JONES, GILLETTE and FADELEY, JJ.

CARSON, Justice.

In this workers' compensation case, the Court of Appeals concluded that the referee's findings of fact, which were affirmed by the Workers' Compensation Board, are not supported by substantial evidence. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 94 Or.App. 362, 765 P.2d 1245 (1988). Substantial evidence supports a finding when the record, viewed as a whole, permits a reasonable person...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases