1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 803 P.2d
  5. 803 P.2d 750 (1990)
 

VON LUBKEN v. HOOD RIVER COUNTY

LUBA 90-031; CA A66473.

803 P.2d 750 (1990)

104 Or. App. 683

Fritz and Joann VON LUBKEN, Von Lubken Orchards, Inc., and Hood River Valley Residents Committee, Inc., Petitioners, v. HOOD RIVER COUNTY and Brookside, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 19, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven L. Pfeiffer, Portland, argued the cause, for petitioners. With him on the brief, were Max M. Miller and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland.

Sally A. Tebbet, Hood River, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondent Hood River County.

B. Gilliland Sharp, Hood River, argued the cause, for respondent Brookside, Inc. With him on the brief, was Jaques & Sharp, Hood River.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA's affirmance of Hood River County's approval of respondent Brookside's application for a conditional use permit to develop a golf course on land that is located, in part, in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone and is "capable of sustaining accepted farming practices." The county zoning ordinance requires that proposed conditional uses comply, inter alia, with the comprehensive plan. The issue is whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases