1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 795 P.2d
  5. 795 P.2d 563 (1990)
 

McGOWAN v. CITY OF EUGENE

89-078; CA A62779.

795 P.2d 563 (1990)

102 Or.App. 512

Robert McGowan and Coeta McGowan, Husband and Wife, Petitioners, v. CITY OF EUGENE, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and Cuddeback Investments, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 18, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Farthing, Eugene, argued the cause, for petitioners. With him on the brief, was Linda Y. Lee, Eugene.

Timothy J. Sercombe, Eugene, argued the cause, for respondent City of Eugene. With him on the brief, was Harrang, Long, Watkinson, Arnold & Laird, P.C., Eugene.

William Kloos, Eugene, argued the cause, for respondent Cuddeback Investments. With him on the brief, was Johnson & Kloos, Eugene.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and ROSSMAN, J.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA's affirmance of the City of Eugene's rezoning of a 29-acre area. The city allowed the zone change after the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission ordered the annexation of the area to the city. Petitioners also sought our review of the boundary commission's annexation order. In McGowan v. Lane Co. Loc. Govt. Bdy. Comm., 102 Or.App. 381

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases