1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 56 Ohio
  5. 56 Ohio St. 3d 68 (1990)
 

HOPE v. HIGHLAND CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 90-179.

56 Ohio St. 3d 68 (1990)

HOPE, APPELLANT, v. HIGHLAND COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 12, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack I. Hope, pro se, for appellant.

Rocky A. Coss, prosecuting attorney, and Ralph W. Phillips, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Adherence to the provisions of the appellate statutes is essential to confer jurisdiction upon the BTA to hear appeals. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Bowers (1946), 147 Ohio St. 147, 34 O.O. 8, 70 N.E.2d 93. R.C. 5717.01 is specific and mandatory. It requires that notice of appeal be filed by the appellant both with the board of revision and with the BTA. Failure to comply with the appellate statute is fatal to the appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases