1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 736 F.Supp.
  5. 736 F.Supp. 505 (1990)
 

ESTEE LAUDER INTERN. v. WORLD WIDE MARINE SERVICE

No. 87 Civ. 7498 (RWS).

736 F.Supp. 505 (1990)

ESTEE LAUDER INTERNATIONAL, INC., and Commercial Union Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. WORLD WIDE MARINE SERVICE, INC., and Travelers Indemnity Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 4, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Waesche, Sheinbaum & O'Regan, P.C., New York City, for plaintiffs; Nicholas P. Giuliano, of counsel.

Harold M. Kingsley, New York City, for defendant Travelers Indem. Co.

Carl N. Mione, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant World Wide Marine Services, Inc.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Estee Lauder International, Inc. and Commercial Union Insurance Companies, ("Lauder") have moved pursuant to Rule 56 for summary judgment against defendant, Travelers ("Travelers"), in the amount of $52,264.80 on a disputed special marine policy allegedly issued by World Wide Marine Service, Inc. ("World Wide") on the a Travelers' form. For the reasons set forth, below this motion is denied and a hearing shall be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases