1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 911 F.2d
  5. 911 F.2d 251 (1990)
 

PRIDE v. EXXON CORP.

No. 89-35276.

911 F.2d 251 (1990)

William T. PRIDE; Pride Enterprises, Inc.; Robert J. Weber, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EXXON CORPORATION; Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 13, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Shannon, Shannon and Johnson, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert G. Abrams, Howrey & Simon, Washington, D.C., and Robert E. Fuller, White Plains, N.Y., for defendants-appellees.

Before WALLACE, SKOPIL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Pride and Pride Enterprises, Inc. (Pride) and Weber appeal from a summary judgment entered by the district court in favor of Exxon Corporation (Exxon) and Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc. (Texaco). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 2805 and possessed pendent jurisdiction over Pride and Weber's state claims. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases