1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 750 F.Supp.
  5. 750 F.Supp. 306 (1990)
 

SPINKA v. BRILL

No. 88 C 8654.

750 F.Supp. 306 (1990)

Bonita SPINKA and Karl Halperin, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Judith BRILL, Robert Schlossberg, John Alden, and Berle Schwartz, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

July 20, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel A. Edelman, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Kenneth C. Shepro, Donald J. Kreger, Ruth Krugly, Altheimer & Gray, Chicago, Ill., Berle L. Schwartz, Law Office of Berle L. Schwartz, Highland Park, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Bonita Spinka ("Spinka") and Karl Halperin ("Halperin") bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that their civil rights were violated when defendants Judith Brill, Robert Schlossberg, John Alden, and Berle Schwartz failed to hold elections for the position of drainage commissioner. We have before us plaintiffs' motion to certify a class, as well as the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases