1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 772 P.2d
  5. 772 P.2d 222 (1989)
 

DAY v. CIBA GEIGY CORP.

No. 16902.

772 P.2d 222 (1989)

115 Idaho 1015

Donald E. DAY, Jr., Donald E. Day, Sr., and William E. Day, Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross Respondents, v. CIBA GEIGY CORPORATION, Defendant/Respondent/Cross Appellant, and Steve Regan Company and John Does I through 10, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

April 17, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Webb, Burton, Carlson, Pedersen & Webb, Twin Falls, for plaintiffs/appellants/cross respondents. Lloyd J. Webb argued.

Parsons, Smith, Stone & Fletcher, Burley, for defendant/respondent/cross appellant. Randolph C. Stone argued.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the district court's order dismissing plaintiffs' complaint for failure of prosecution under I.R.C.P. 41(b). The Days sued for damages to their raspberry crop allegedly due to the application of PRINCEP 80W, a chemical compound manufactured and sold by CIBA Geigy Corporation. The Days applied PRINCEP 80W to their raspberry crop in 1978 and 1979. The Days filed this action in July of 1980...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases