MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW v. HARVEY

No. 17449.

772 P.2d 216 (1989)

115 Idaho 1009

MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant, v. Floyd W. HARVEY, individually, and Hells Canyon Excursions, Inc., an Idaho corporation, Defendants-Counter-claimants-Respondents, and Bruce Oakes, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

April 7, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cantrill, Skinner, Sullivan & King, Boise, for appellant. Frank P. Kotyk argued.

Hawley, Troxell, Ennis & Hawley, Boise, for respondents Harvey and Hells Canyon Excursions, Inc. Merlyn W. Clark argued.


BISTLINE, Justice.

Having considered the briefs and record, and having heard oral argument we are persuaded that the able district judge explained the facts and the law in this case extremely well. Judge Schroeder's opinion addressed all of the issues raised on appeal. We adopt his opinion, in substantial part, as our own. In addition, we will address the issue of attorney fees on appeal following reproduction of the district court's opinion below:

"In 1977...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases