1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 743 F.Supp.
  5. 743 F.Supp. 190 (1989)
 

HEYMAN v. SALLE

No. 88 Civ. 2488 (RPP).

743 F.Supp. 190 (1989)

Kenneth HEYMAN and John Rublowsky, Plaintiffs, v. David SALLE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murphy & Zissu by Michael Zissu (Susan J. Steiger, of counsel), New York City, for plaintiffs.

John B. Koegel, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiffs Kenneth Heyman and John Rublowsky have brought claims against defendants David Salle and Jean Kallina, alleging (1) federal copyright infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (the "Copyright Act"), (2) federal trademark infringement pursuant to section 43(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)), (3) unfair competition under New York State law, and (4) a violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases