1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 716 F.Supp.
  5. 716 F.Supp. 195 (1989)
 

JULES JURGENSEN/RHAPSODY v. ROLEX WATCH U.S.A.

Civ. A. No. 85-5605.

716 F.Supp. 195 (1989)

JULES JURGENSEN/RHAPSODY, INC. v. ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC. and Montres Rolex S.A.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

June 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan C. Kessler, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

David H.T. Kane and Stephen F. Ruffino, New York City, and Richard C. Rizzo, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

This action comes before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The action arises out of Jurgensen's alleged breach of a settlement agreement which prohibited Jurgensen from marketing a particular watch bracelet. For the reasons stated below, we grant Rolex's motion and deny Jurgensen's motion.

FACTS

In 1985, plaintiff Jules Jurgensen filed an amended complaint alleging that defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases