VILLELLA v. WAIKEM MOTORS, INC.

No. 88-64.

45 Ohio St. 3d 36 (1989)

VILLELLA, APPELLEE, v. WAIKEM MOTORS, INC., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 16, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald C. Steiner, for appellee.

Messerman & Messerman Co., L.P.A., and Gerald A. Messerman, for appellant.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

I

In its first proposition of law, the appellant asserts that punitive damages should not have been awarded to appellee, because the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to support a finding of actual malice, which is a prerequisite to punitive damages recovery.

Historically, punitive damages in Ohio have been allowed in civil tort actions which involve ingredients of fraud, malice, or insult. Roberts v. Mason...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases