1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 713 F.Supp.
  5. 713 F.Supp. 72 (1989)
 

HECHT v. COMMERCE CLEARING HOUSE, INC.

No. 86 CIV. 9839 (SWK).

713 F.Supp. 72 (1989)

Jeffrey HECHT, Plaintiff, v. COMMERCE CLEARING HOUSE, INC., William Miller, Louis Ceccoli, and Stanley Stephens, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 21, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Flomenhaft, New York City, for plaintiff.

Sidley & Austin by Theodore J. Theophilos, Kelley A. Cornish, New York City, by Lawrence I. Kipperman, Jean F. Holloway, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

This action arises out of the civil remedies provision of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (1984) and common-law principles of fraud and prima facie tort. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal Rules of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases