1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 383 S.E.2d
  5. 383 S.E.2d 390 (1989)
 

HUNT v. SCOTSMAN CONVENIENCE STORE NO. 93

No. 8810IC1397.

383 S.E.2d 390 (1989)

Harold HUNT, Employee, Plaintiff, v. SCOTSMAN CONVENIENCE STORE NO. 93, Employer, and Home Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 19, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh D. Cox, Greenville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Hedrick, Eatman, Gardner and Kincheloe by Francis B. Prior and Anne Strader Tise, Wilmington, for defendant-appellee.

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiff brings forward the following three assignments of error:

1. The Full Commission's affirmation of the Opinion and Award of the ... Deputy Commissioner of the North Carolina Industrial Commission, in his Finding of Fact No. 3 that the plaintiff's testimony was not credible because of exaggeration and misstatement of the truth.... 2. The Full Commission's affirmation of the Opinion and Award of the ... Deputy Commissioner of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases