1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 709 F.Supp.
  5. 709 F.Supp. 44 (1989)
 

CONTINENTAL CAS. CO. v. PULLMAN, COMLEY, ET AL.

Civ. No. B-88-353 (AHN).

709 F.Supp. 44 (1989)

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. PULLMAN, COMLEY, BRADLEY & REEVES, et al.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 14, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob D. Zeldes, L. Douglas Shrader, Zeldes, Needle & Cooper, P.C., Bridgeport, Conn., for plaintiff.

John C. Heffernan, Heffernan, Farr, Morrelli & McChord, Hartford, Conn., Cushing O. Condon, Ford, Marrin, Esposito & Whitmeyer, New York City, for defendant.

RULING ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

NEVAS, District Judge.

Continental Casualty Company ("Continental"), the plaintiff in this diversity action, brought a two count complaint against the Connecticut law firm of Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves and its partners (collectively "Pullman"), and against The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company ("Aetna"). Count one alleges legal malpractice by Pullman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases