1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 729 F.Supp.
  5. 729 F.Supp. 7 (1989)
 

U.S. v. LaFRANCE

Crim. No. 89-213-H.

729 F.Supp. 7 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Edmond P. LaFRANCE, Peter E. Knox and Richard A. LaFrance, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

November 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick Walsh, U.S. Atty., for U.S.

Michael Collora and William H. Kettlewell, Boston, Mass., for Edmond P. LaFrance.

Amos Hugh Scott, Choate, Hall & Stewart, Boston, Mass., for Richard A. LaFrance.

Thomas E. Peisch, Boston, Mass., for Peter E. Knox.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRINGTON, District Judge.

The defendants move to dismiss the indictment on the ground that Title 31, United States Code, Section 5324(3) is unconstitutional as being void-for-vagueness. 31 U.S.C. § 5324(3) sets forth, in pertinent part:

No person shall for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements of section 5313(a) with respect to such transaction— . . . . . (3) structure or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases