HAMEL v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.


233 N.J. Super. 502 (1989)

559 A.2d 455

JOANN HAMEL AND RICHARD HAMEL, HER HUSBAND, PER QUOD, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 26, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D'Amico & Cofone, attorneys for appellant (Bruce L. Magaw, on the brief).

Andrew S. Prince, attorney for respondents Hamel (Andrew S. Prince, on the brief).

Robert A. Auerbach, attorney for respondent Prudential Insurance Company (Randi S. Greenberg, on the brief).

Before Judges ANTELL, DREIER and BROCHIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BROCHIN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

JoAnn Hamel was injured in an automobile accident. She and her husband, Richard P. Hamel, asserted a claim against William Snee, the driver of the other car involved in the accident.

Mr. Snee's automobile liability insurer was Allstate Insurance Company. The limit of his relevant coverage was $15,000, and, because of the apparent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases